While many Christians give little thought to the workings of divine inspiration, it is a crucial area of biblical study. How we imagine the way God inspires scripture shapes how we use and are guided by it.
(From Lumo)
Divine inspiration—how God’s word is communicated to human authors—has been interpreted in several ways across Christian traditions. Below is a concise overview of the main strands of thought, grouped by theological family and then by the particular nuances each tradition tends to emphasise.
Roman Catholic
The Roman Catholic view on inspiration is one of divine-human cooperation. (Concurrence).
Eastern Orthodox
This tradition believes in mystical illumination rather than a strict doctrinal formula. Emphasis on the theosis (deification) of the believer through the living Word. Scripture is seen as a living voice that transforms the believer.
The reformed evangelical
Reformed churches believe in verbal plenary inspiration (sometimes called “verbal dictation”).
Every word of the original manuscripts is directly inspired by the Holy Spirit (“plenary” = whole, “verbal” = word‑by‑word). The original autographs are inerrant, but copies may contain scribal errors. The doctrine undergirds the authority of Scripture in matters of doctrine, worship, and life.
Summary
So the Catholic and Orthodox view of inspiration is that the Spirit guides the writing of scripture within the culture and experience of the prophet. Scripture continues to be a living text that can be understood under the leading of the Holy Spirit and applied to the current cultural context as it transforms the believer. The evangelical view is that God dictated each word of scripture in the original language. The process of translation and transmission may introduce errors.
We see these different views played out in the way each tradition uses and studies scripture.